We acquire WordPress agencies. Is yours next?

SRB/ENG

Home  /  Case Studies  / 

Remediating a 92-issue accessibility audit to WCAG 2.1 AA

Accessibility Remediation · ProductDock · Software development

92 accessibility issues, one target: WCAG 2.1 AA. We fixed all of them.

ProductDock is a software company that takes accessibility seriously enough to audit its own website against WCAG 2.1 AA. The audit came back with 92 issues and a fix brief. What it needed next was engineers to turn that list into real, code-level change. That was us.

WCAG 2.1 AA

The compliance target

92 issues

Across every WCAG principle

4 principles

Perceivable, operable, understandable, robust

Desktop + mobile

Fixed on both

Client snapshot

ProductDock is a software development company. When they decided their website should be usable by everyone, they did the hard part properly: a full internal accessibility audit of the site against WCAG 2.1 AA, documented issue by issue, with severities and a fix brief. Then they brought in a partner to implement it, and the project came to us through Mineweb.

What the audit found

This was not a vague “make it accessible” request. It was a precise one. The audit identified 92 issues, graded by severity and mapped to the four WCAG principles:

By WCAG principle, the weight sat where it usually does: Perceivable (53 issues, things like missing alt text and weak color contrast), Operable (28 issues, keyboard traps and focus problems), Understandable (4 issues, unclear headings), and Robust (8 issues, markup that assistive technology could not parse). The goal was WCAG 2.1 AA, on desktop and mobile, for people with visual, auditory, physical, and cognitive disabilities.

What we remediated

We worked through the brief category by category, at the level of the code rather than an overlay widget:

How we worked

We ran it in phases, the way an audit this size should be run: the high and medium-severity issues first, since those are the ones that actually block someone, then the long tail of low-severity refinements, then a final accessibility pass to confirm the fixes held.

And we verified with the tools that tell the truth, not just an automated scanner: VoiceOver for the real screen-reader experience, Accessibility Insights for structured checks, and dedicated contrast checkers for the color work. Automated tools catch a fraction of WCAG. The rest you have to operate the site to find, which is exactly what we did.

The outcome

All 92 issues were remediated at the code level, across all four WCAG principles, on desktop and mobile. The site the client had audited against WCAG 2.1 AA now actually meets the standard it was measured against, and the people the audit was written for, keyboard-only users, screen-reader users, people who need real contrast, can use it.

Accessibility is one of the few areas of web work where “looks fine to me” is worthless. It either passes for the person relying on it or it does not. A client who audits their own site to this standard deserves an implementation held to the same one, and that is what we delivered.

Area

Before

After

Open issues

92 from the audit

Remediated to WCAG 2.1 AA

Keyboard use

Traps & lost focus

Full keyboard operability

Screen readers

Silent state, broken semantics

Announced & navigable

Contrast

Below AA on small text

AA thresholds met

Tech and tools

WCAG 2.1 AA

Semantic HTML

ARIA roles & labels

Keyboard & focus management

VoiceOver testing

Accessibility Insights

Contrast checkers

Services used on this project

More case studies

Related projects.

Professional Services & B2B

A B2B ordering portal for EQUASHIELD, wired into SAP Business ByDesign

Professional Services & B2B

Reviving a neglected luxury-kitchen resale site and its broken lead flow

White gradient
Create your
Project
Website
Brand
Contact Us!
Work
With Us